페이지 정보

작성자귀요미 조회 3회 작성일 2021-06-21 10:34:45 댓글 0


Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS Lens Re-review (with samples)

I originally reviewed this lens about 3 years ago, back when I was still throwing videos together on Windows Movie Maker. I've standardized and improved my reviews a lot since then, and I've gotten to use this lens (and others) a lot more and discovered a lot more about photography - so here's a more thorough, updated review for you all. This is probably my favorite (if there could be one!) review I've put together so far, as I've used a lot of my photos and video from South Korea as samples for you.

Find it here (Amazon Affiliate link):

If you've found this or other videos I've made to be helpful, then support me on Patreon! https://www.patreon.com/christopherfrost?ty=h

All photos and video taken by me, on my trusty Canon 60D. The poor thing is really wearing down now...

Be sure to follow my Photostream on Flickr, to see sample pictures of lenses I've reviewed and to see previews of upcoming lenses, too! https://www.flickr.com/photos/56334263@N07/

Music: "Opportunity Walks" by Kevin Macleod (www.incompetech.com)
Min Bui Chai : Hi Chris thanks for a second reviews of this lens. I found my copy having purple fringing and not as sharp even in the middle when wide open at f2.8 zooming to 55mm.
Cody Dalton : Will this lens work with a 7D Mark II? I need a low light lens for it and are considering buying this.
Enzo Smit : Does it work with a 70d
Claro Pires : Thank you for your videos. It helped me a million to build my kit. Every lens that I have I can recall something about your videos that lead me to chose it.
Derryl Gabel : Hi Chris, I would like to use this lens to shoot guitar tutorial videos. I'd like to mount the camera above my PC monitor so the end of the lens would be 3.5 feet away from the guitar. Will this get all of my guitar in the frame being this close to the lens with a nice blurred background? My guitar is 2 foot 3 inches long.

Canon Ef S 17 55mm F 2 8 Is Usm Review

Canon Ef S 17 55mm F 2 8 Is Usm : Like so many people, I bought this to replace my kit lens. In my case that's the 18-55mm IS associated with the XSI. The main issue I had with that lens was the variable (and small) aperature. I wanted constant 2.8 without sacrificing zoom or IS. That's what you get here.https://amzn.to/3hatFSI

1. Optical quality. So far, it seems unambiguously better than the 18-55. No surprises there. I don't see any issues with aberrations, though I seldom take photos fully wide open and that's where people tend to see them.

2. Performance. It zooms quickly and quietly and it has full time manual, so you can tweak the zoom after it has zoomed. It's really nice that the focus ring doesn't twist when it focuses. You can keep your hand on it without worrying about interfering with the focusing. It's an excellent design.

3. Weight. It's heavy. There's a huge difference between this and the kit lens. If I were to go on a long walk with my camera, I'd take the kit lens for weight reasons. Besides, outdoors the advantages of this lens are much less. Also this is an expensive lens so I'd never take it somewhere where it might get hurt.

4. Design. The front lens is really close to the front, so watch out for fingerprints. I use a lens hood and it keeps stuff away from the glass. It also cuts down on the ghosting, which apparently this lens is prone to although I haven't experienced it. Like I mentioned, I really just use this lens indoors. The construction has been critisized, but it feels pretty solid to me. It's not metal, but it's heavy, hard plastic. I have used L lenses before and unless you are coming under gun fire I see no need for the metal construction. People have complained of dust inside the lens. I have been using mine frequently for a month or so and I don't have any dust in there at all. That's not much time, so we'll see. The zoom ring is very large. It practically begs you to use the zoom instead of walking back and forth. And the constant F2.8 helps encourage that. Why physically move when you can zoom without losing aperature?

5. Aperature. I think 2.8 is a great aperature for indoors. It's not so wide that the field of view is so narrow that people's noses are out of focus if their eyes are in. It's wide enough that you get a pleasant bokeh and take pictures in pretty low light. It's an excellent width for indoor shots of your kids and stuff. That's what I use it for. When I want crazy bokeh I use my F1.8 prime, which works well for that. That doesn't happen much, though. The difference between F2.8 and what you'd be using in the kit lens is very noticeable. Totally a good thing.

6. Accessories. I don't use any filters, but this lens really deserves a hood. I can't abide the prices canon charges for their hood here, but on ebay you can get a knockoff shipped from Hong Kong for like 1/6 the price. I did, and it's a really sturdy, well-fitting, excellent hood.

7. Image stabilization. I'm in the camp that thinks IS is really important. Shaky hands and all that. The IS doesn't make any noise and it doesn't noticeably drain the battery, so I have it on almost all the time. I haven't really tested it thoroughly to see how well it works, but I assume it works about as well as other lens based IS systems. If so, it works well.

So far this lens has lived up to my expectations. The USM is nicer than I expected and everything else is pretty much what people say. It's a great lens. Overpriced, yes, but it's a real winner. As long as you remember it's just a lens and it can't change the quality of your composition and lighting, you won't be disappointed. I wasn't.

Get both, though. You won't be disappointed.
Canon ef-s 17-55mm f/2.8 is usm. Canon ef-s 17-55mm f/2.8 is usm lens. Canon efs 17-55mm lens. Canon ef s 17 55mm. Canon ef-s 17-55mm f/2.8. Canon efs 17-55mm f/2.8 is usm. Canon 17 55mm f2 8. Canon efs 17-55mm f/2.8 is usm lens. Canon 17-55mm. Canon 17-55mm f2.8. Canon 17 55mm. Canon ef 17-55mm f/2.8. Canon 17-55mm lens. Canon 17-55mm 2.8. Canon ef-s 17-55mm f/2.8 is usm lens. Canon ef s 17 55mm f2 8 is usm price. Canon ef-s 17-55 f2 8 is usm. Canon ef-s 17-55mm f2 8 is usm review.

#canon_ef-s_17-55mm_f/2.8_is_usm #canon_ef-s_17-55mm_f/2.8_is_usm_lens #canon_efs_17-55mm_lens #canon_ef_s_17_55mm #canon_ef-s_17-55mm_f/2.8 #canon_efs_17-55mm_f/2.8_is_usm #canon_17_55mm_f2_8 #canon_efs_17-55mm_f/2.8_is_usm_lens #canon_17-55mm #canon_17-55mm_f2.8 #canon_17_55mm #canon_ef_17-55mm_f/2.8 #canon_17-55mm_lens #canon_17-55mm_2.8 #canon_ef-s_17-55mm_f/2.8_is_usm_lens #canon_ef_s_17_55mm_f2_8_is_usm_price #canon_ef-s_17-55_f2_8_is_usm #canon_ef-s_17-55mm_f2_8_is_usm_review
Bonnie 123 : Recommend
Ardiyanto T : For video.. you could also convert this lens into EF mount, then add lens adapter EF to E (sony) or EF to MFT (Lumix/BMPCC/ZCam, Etc) by removing the back lens cover only by pulling it with your thumb/finger :) Don't use any tools or it will scratch the plastic.
CRP Films : I am buying it this one too
BramowitchIII : Why did you steal this video?
oDo HaYo : I have this lenes but the outo focus in video has a sound so you better record sound and sync it in post

Canon 17-55mm f2.8 - All-Time Greatest EF-S Lens?

Canon 17-55mm f2.8: https://amzn.to/3l2IAAJ
Sigma 17-50mm f2.8: https://amzn.to/39irWKa
Sigma 18-35mm f1.8: https://amzn.to/3lYPcSy

Here's my review of the Canon 17-55mm f2.8 lens! This was the first lens I ever bought to upgrade from a kit lens and it served me well for the entire first year I ran my videography company. I highly suggest this lens for both photo and video. It's definitely a gem!

0:00 - Intro
0:24 - Build Quality Issue
0:56 - Standard Zoom Range
1:12 - F2.8 Aperture \u0026 Bokeh
1:34 - Sharpness
2:03 - Optical Stabilization Test
2:30 - Autofocus Test \u0026 Noise
2:42 - Price
3:14 - Alternatives To Look At

Links to stuff I use:
MY MAIN CAMERA: https://amzn.to/3l2HMfm
MY (NEWER) GO-TO LENS: https://amzn.to/3jiqAlt
Soul Food Cooking : Very helpful. Thanks!
Ethan Hatia : Great video man! Two things that are making me doubt this lens for the Blackmagic Pocket 4k. Is the stabilization smooth when panning? Also is the stabilization annoyingly loud?
Willem Bovekerk : Great review. Thinking about this lens. Helped a lot! Thanks.
Lisa Hunt : Really great review, thank you! I just purchased a Canon EOS 90D and this lens came with the package so your video was perfect (and not too critical ;) )
Muhammad Ihza Hutajulu : Which is better between this and sigma 17-50 f2.8? I am confuse




등록된 댓글이 없습니다.

전체 3,689건 1 페이지
게시물 검색
Copyright © www.myartnet.kr. All rights reserved.  Contact : help@oxmail.xyz